| |
Verdicts
Yospa Werner v. Saks Fifth Avenue, Supreme
Court, Kings County
In April of 2007, Ms. Campbell was successful in representing
the defendant Saks Fifth Avenue in this case filed by plaintiff,
Yospa Werner. After a trial before Judge Schack, the jury rendered
a verdict in favor of the defendant Saks Fifth Avenue. Plaintiff
claimed that the store was negligent because they created a dangerous
condition. Specifically, plaintiff tripped over a coffee table located
in a seating area on the 8th floor of the store during a sale on
December 26, 2004. She claimed that the store was crowded, the table
was too low for her to see and it should not have been on the selling
floor. Ms. Campbell argued that the table was an open and obvious
condition and the cause of the accident was the plaintiff's failure
to look where she was going. The plaintiff Yospa Werner and Saks
employee Karen Plower testified.
Prendergast v. James Roberto, All Island Stucco, Yehousha Langsam
and Metr Volk
After a two day bench trial in the Supreme Court,
Kings County in
June 2006, Judge Francois Rivera issued a defense verdict on behalf
of our firm's clients, James Roberto and All Island Stucco. All
claims and cross-claims against the defendants Roberto and All Island
Stucco were dismissed, with prejudice. Denise Campbell tried the
case on behalf of the firm at the request of the defendants' insurance
carrier, General Casualty Insurance Company of Simsbury, Connecticut.
This case arose as a result of a multi car accident on the Belt
Parkway that occurred on March 7, 2003. After hearing testimony,
Judge Rivera found the testimony of Roberto and non-party witness
Linda Amato to be credible. They testified that the vehicle driven
by Roberto had come to a complete stop before being rear-ended by
the Langsam vehicle and pushed into the Prendergast vehicle. Plaintiff
testified that the Roberto vehicle rear ended his vehicle twice,
once before and once after being hit by the Langsam vehicle. The
Court found the testimony of the plaintiff not credible.
Jeffrey Keltz v. Vincent Nastro, Supreme
Court, Kings County.
Ms. Campbell obtained a defense verdict in this
case by arguing that the plaintiff’s injuries did not meet
the New York No-Fault Threshold, despite the fact that the plaintiff
underwent surgery for his injury, a torn biceps tendon. The plaintiff,
Jeffrey Keltz alleged that Ms. Campbell’s client, Vincent
Nastro, rear-ended him. After the plaintiff’s counsel was
successful on a pre-trial motion for summary judgment based on liability,
the proceeded to trial so that a jury could decide whether Mr. Keltz
suffered a “Serious Injury” in accordance with the New
York No-Fault Law.
After a five day trial in the Supreme Court, Kings
County before Judge Harkavay, a jury entered a unanimous verdict
in favor of the defendant, finding that although the accident was
Mr. Nastro’s fault and although Mr. Keltz injured his shoulder
and underwent surgery, his injury did not qualify as a “Serious
Injury” as defined by the New York No-Fault Law.
Rosemary Baehney v. Property Asset Management, Inc., Crown
Northcorp., Inc., E.W. Murray, Inc., and Outdoor Matters Landscaping,
Inc., Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County.
In this action, Ms. Campbell represented property
manager, E.W. Murray, Inc. and building owner Crown Northcorp.,
Inc. Rosemary Baehney alleged that as she was leaving the premises,
she slipped on black ice in the parking lot of the premises and
sustained a fracture to her arm which required surgery.
After a five day trial before Judge Rosalie B.
Cooper, of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County, the jury
rendered a unanimous verdict in favor of Ms. Campbell’s clients,
Crown Northcorp., Inc. and E.W. Murray, Inc., based on the fact
that they did not find the plaintiff’s claim (that she slipped
on black ice) to be credible.
Beverly Bonasto v. Macy’s East, Inc., Superior Court
of New Jersey, Camden County.
In this case, Ms. Campbell represented the department
store, Macy’s Inc. Plaintiff, Beverly Bonasto, alleged that
the shoes she purchased at Macy’s were defective and as a
result of that defect, she was caused to slip and fall. Ms. Bonasto
suffered a fractured kneecap which required several surgical procedures.
This case was tried before Judge Snyder of the
Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County. After hearing testimony
from the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s shoe expert and the defendant’s
shoe expert, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of Ms. Campbell’s
client, Macy’s, Inc.
|